Design and Validity of Electronic Assessments to Assess Students' Critical Thinking Skills on Momentum and Impulse Materials

Diah Ayu Oktaviawati; Fatni Mufit

doi:10.24036/jppf.v11i2.20

Authors

Diah Ayu Oktaviawati Universitas Negeri Padang Author
Fatni Mufit Department of Physics, Padang State University, Padang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/jppf.v11i2.20

Keywords:

Electronic Assessment, Critical Thinking Skills, Momentum and Impulse

Abstract

Learners in the 21st century must have 4C skills, Among these is the capacity for critical thought, especially in physics learning. Students' critical thinking abilities must be examined in order to prepare them for the twenty-first century. Assessment instruments that specifically assess students' critical thinking skills on momentum and impulse material are not yet available. So this research aims to develop a valid electronic assessment to assess students' critical thinking skills on momentum and impulse material. This research is a development research (R&D) using the Plomp model. The data collection instruments used were interview sheets, self-evaluation sheets and validation sheets. The developed electronic assessment was validated by three validators. The electronic assessment had a high validity category in terms of material substance, learning design, visual communication, and software use, according to the validity analysis results. From the validation results with an average value of 0.92, it shows that the electronic assessment to assess students' critical thinking skills on momentum and impulse material is declared valid and feasible to use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ariadila, S. N., Silalahi, Y. F. N., Fadiyah, F. H., Jamaluddin, U., & Setiawan, S. (2023). Analisis Pentingnya Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis TerhadapPembelajaran Bagi Siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(20), 664–669.

Arini, W., & Juliadi, F. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika Untuk Pokok Bahasan Kelistrikan dan Penerapannya dalam Kehidupan. Berkala Fisika Indonesia, 10(1), 1–11. Retrieved from http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/BFI/article/download/9485/4577

Dirman, H. M., & Mufit, F. (2022). Disain dan Validitas E-Instrument Five Tier-Multiple Choice Test Menggunakan iSpring Quiz Maker Sebagai Asesmen Literasi Sains Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Abad-21. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 3170–7179. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2300

Ennis, R. (2011). Critical Thinking: Reflection and Perspective Part II. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(2), 5–19.

Gunawan, M. S., & Mufit, F. (2024). Design and Validity of an E-Assessment Four Tier Multiple Choice To Assess Science Literacy Skills of Senior High School Students. Physics Learning and Education, 2(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v2i1.97

Hidayatullah, & Mufit, F. (2023). Five-Tier Multiple-Choice Instrument for Assessing Students’ Understanding of the Straight Motion. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 6(2), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i2.52366

Jufriadi, A., Huda, C., Aji, S. D., Pratiwi, H. Y., & Ayu, H. D. (2022). Analisis Keterampilan Abad 21 Melalui Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 7(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v7i1.2482

Juliyantika, T., & Batubara, H. H. (2022). Tren Penelitian Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis pada Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar di Indonesia. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 4731–4744. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2869

Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Surat Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Nomor: 1152/H3/SK.02.01/2023. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi, (September).

Khasanah, A., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Otentik Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(2), 21–35. Retrieved from https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/pfisika/index

M Sungkowo. (2010). Panduan Pengembanagn Bahan Ajar Berbasis TIK. Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis TIK, i–23.

Mufit, F. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Konflik Kognitif (PbKK) untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Meremediasi Miskonsepsi, 37. Retrieved from https://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/zqvrd/

Mufit, F. (2024). Students ’ Critical Thinking Ability on Global Warming Material at Pariaman High School, 17(3), 208–217.

Mufit, F., Hendriyani, Y., Usmeldi, Dhanil, M., & Tanjung, M. R. (2023). The Effectiveness of Smartphone-Based Interactive Multimedia Integrated Cognitive Conflict Models to Improve 21st-Century Skills. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(11), 1793–1801. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.11.1991

Mufit, F., & Syamsidar, S. (2022). Development of Four-Tier Multiple Choice Test Instrument to Identify Students’ Concept Understanding of Newton’s Law Material. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 7(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v7i2.2369

Nurfadlia Mappalesye, S. S. S. dan K. A. (2021). dan kualitas sistem penilaiannya . Keduanya saling terkait antara satu dengan yang lain . Menurut World Economic Forum USA kompetensi yang dibutuhkan di abad ke- Collaboration ( Word Economic Forum , 2015 ). Berdasarkan data tersebut maka setiap individu, (1), 69–83.

Nurjanah, N. E., & Mukarromah, T. T. (2021). Pembelajaran Berbasis Media Digital pada Anak Usia Dini di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 : Studi Literatur. Jurnal Ilmiah Potensia, 6(1), 66–77.

Permata, A. R., Muslim, M., & Suyana, I. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sma Pada Materi Momentum Dan Impuls, VIII, SNF2019-PE-9–16. https://doi.org/10.21009/03.snf2019.01.pe.02

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational Design Research Educational Design Research. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development: SLO, 1–206. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ815766

Rahmawati, I., Hidayat, A., & Rahayu, S. (2020). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Gaya dan Penerapannya. Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM.

Renostini Harefa, A. (2019). Peran Ilmu Fisika Dalam Kehidupan Sehari-Hari. Jurnal Warta , (April), 1–10.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian).

Safira, S., Suyanto, E., & Nyeneng, I. D. P. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian untuk mengukur kemampuan berpikir kritis pada materi dinamika partikel secara online. Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 83. https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v8i2.21173

Sari, N. F., Mufit, F., Hidayanti, H., & Dwiridal, L. (2023). Review Analysis of Animated Test Questions Towards Understanding Concepts in Physics Learning. Konstan - Jurnal Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 8(02), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.20414/konstan.v8i02.201

Shofiyah, N., & Sartika, S. B. (2018). Buku Ajar Asesmen Pembelajaran. Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents (Vol. 5).

Silvia et al. (2020). Validitas Asesmen Autentik Berbasis Model Learning Cycle 5e Bermuatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Pada Materi Usaha Dan Energi , Momentum Dan Impuls Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika , FMIPA Universitas Negeri Padang Staf Pengajar Jurusan Fis. Education, Physics, 13(2), 345–352.

Wijaya, T. P., & Mufit, F. (2023). The Five-Tier Multiple Choice Instruments in Parabolic Motion for Assessing Concept Understanding of High School Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2582(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2582/1/012041

Wilda susanti, linda fatmawati saleh, N. (2022). Pemikiran Kritis dan Kreatif. (M. . Harini Fajar Ningrum, Ed.). Bandung: CV. MEDIA SAINS INDONESIA.