Analysis of Scientific Literacy and Need to Develop POE-Based Student Worksheet in Dynamic Material for High School

Authors

  • Salsa Kurnia Magfirah Universitas Negeri Padang Author
  • Selma Riyasni Departmen of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang Author
  • Asrizal Departmen of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang Author
  • Fauziah Ulmi Departmen of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/jppf.v12i1.45

Keywords:

LKPD, physics learning, Student Worksheet

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of scientific literacy skills in physics learning, especially in dynamics material that requires students to be able to understand concepts, interpret data, and explain scientific phenomena logically. However, students' scientific literacy skills are classified as not yet optimally developed. This study aims to analyze the level of students' scientific literacy and identify the need for the development of Predict-Observe-Explain (POE)-based Student Worksheets (LKPD), especially in dynamics material. This study uses a descriptive method with quantitative and qualitative approaches. The subjects of the study were 30 students of grade XI Phase F2 of Madrasah Aliyah in Pariaman City. Data were obtained through scientific literacy tests, student needs questionnaires, document analysis, and interviews with physics teachers. The results showed that the average scientific literacy ability of students in the indicator of explaining scientific phenomena was 58.66%, the indicator of evaluating and designing scientific investigations was 46.67%, and the indicator of interpreting data and scientific evidence was 46.66%. These results indicate that students' scientific literacy abilities are still categorized as moderate and need to be improved, especially in the ability to design investigations and interpret scientific data. Therefore, it is necessary to develop LKPD based on the POE model which can facilitate prediction, observation, and scientific explanation activities so that it can support the improvement of students' scientific literacy outcomes in dynamics learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Selma Riyasni, Departmen of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang

    lecturer, Departement of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

References

Anggraeni, D. M., et al. (2023). Systematic review of problem-based learning research in science education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100266.

Apriyani, R., Fadilah, S., & Wahyuni, S. (2021). The effect of learning models on students’ scientific literacy ability in physics learning: A meta-analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(Special Issue), 201–208.

Asrizal, A., & Festiyed, F. (2020). Studi pendampingan pengembangan bahan ajar tematik terintegrasi literasi baru dan literasi bencana pada guru IPA Kabupaten Agam. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 4(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol4-iss1/431

Elviana, E., Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., & Sutrio, S. (2024). Development of POE-based student worksheets to improve students’ scientific literacy and conceptual understanding in science learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 844–853.

Fiteriani, I., Umam, R., Hasanah, U., & Andriani, S. (2023). The implementation of Predict–Observe–Explain in science learning and its impact on students’ critical thinking: A systematic review. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 14(2), 115–129.

Handayani, D., Maison, M., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2022). Students’ scientific literacy profile in physics learning: An analysis based on competence aspects. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2101–2108.

Hemtasin, C., et al. (2026). Designing a phenomenon-based learning boxset to foster scientific literacy. International Journal of Educational Research Open.

Hidayat, R., Asrizal, A., & Festiyed, F. (2022). Analysis of scientific literacy skills of senior high school students in physics learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 8(2), 89–98.

Hong, J. C., et al. (2021). Critical attitude and ability associated with students’ self-confidence and attitude toward predict–observe–explain online science inquiry learning. Computers & Education.

Jiang, A., & Li, X. (2024). Enhancing cognitive abilities through the POE teaching strategy in a virtual cultural learning environment. Displays.

Kurniawati, I. D., Wartono, W., & Diantoro, M. (2021). Scientific literacy skills of senior high school students on mechanics topic: A descriptive study. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 17(1), 45–53.

Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2021). On the promise and potential of STEM education. Science Education, 105(5), 101–104.

Lin, M. Y., et al. (2025). The influence of preschool teachers’ critical thinking on predict–observe–explain inquiry learning. Computers & Education.

Maison, M., Kurniawan, D. A., Ningsih, Y. A., & Sukarni, W. (2020). Student perception of physics learning and scientific literacy skills in senior high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 123–131.

Mufit, F., Asrizal, A., & Hanum, L. (2021). The need analysis of physics teaching materials to improve students’ scientific literacy in senior high school. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(1), 1–10.

Nestlog, E. B., et al. (2024). Disciplinary content and text structures communicated in primary science classrooms. Linguistics and Education.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.

Pektaş, H. M., & Özdemir, M. (2024). The effect of predict–observe–explain strategy on students’ conceptual understanding and scientific reasoning in science education. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 1–21.

Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2021). Analysis of students’ scientific literacy in physics learning based on competence and knowledge aspects. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 17(2), 119–128.

Putri, M. A., Lubis, P. H., & Lia, L. (2020). Development of student worksheets to support active learning in physics instruction. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 6(2), 320–326.

Rahmawati, D., Asrizal, A., & Festiyed, F. (2023). Needs analysis of POE-based worksheet development in physics learning for senior high school students. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 55–64.

Ramadhani, A., Mufit, F., & Asrizal, A. (2024). Scientific literacy analysis of students on Newtonian mechanics based on the PISA framework. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 10(1), 23–34.

Samya, S., Hidayat, A., & Sutopo, S. (2021). The effectiveness of Predict–Observe–Explain learning in improving students’ conceptual understanding and critical thinking in physics. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika, 6(3), 247–255.

Sari, D. P., Kurniawan, D. A., & Maison, M. (2022). Description of scientific literacy ability of high school students in learning physics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1450–1458.

Song, Y., et al. (2022). Mapping primary students’ mobile collaborative inquiry learning behaviors. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 164, 102835.

Sukaesih, S., Ridlo, S., Saptono, S., & Alimah, S. (2022). Scientific literacy profile of Indonesian students in science learning: A review of recent studies. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 11(2), 155–166.

Sulistiyono, S., Arini, W., & Wicaksono, I. (2022). Analisis kebutuhan LKPD fisika berbasis Predict–Observe–Explain pada pembelajaran IPA/fisika. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 11(2), 75–83.

Tucker, M. C., et al. (2024). Prediction versus production for teaching computer science concepts. Computers & Education.

Usmeldi, U., & Amini, R. (2022). Development of integrated science teaching materials to improve students’ literacy and scientific process skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 355–362.

Wahyuni, S., Indrawati, I., & Sudarti, S. (2021). Development of POE-based student worksheets in physics learning to improve students’ scientific process skills. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 10(3), 129–138.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Analysis of Scientific Literacy and Need to Develop POE-Based Student Worksheet in Dynamic Material for High School (S. K. Magfirah, S. . Riyasni, A. Asrizal, & F. Ulmi , Trans.). (2026). Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 12(1), 118-129. https://doi.org/10.24036/jppf.v12i1.45

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>